Thirty years of HVAC and plumbing engineering practice. Independent expert witness analysis for construction defect, personal injury, and insurance subrogation matters — retained by attorneys and insurers across the Mountain West and beyond.
JM Engineering accepts retention by plaintiff counsel, defense counsel, and insurance carriers. All engagements are independent — compensation is never contingent on outcome or opinions rendered.
"I need a qualified HVAC expert who can write a solid report and hold up under cross-examination."
Available for retention by both plaintiff and defense counsel in construction defect, personal injury, and insurance coverage matters. Engagements include document review, site inspection, written analysis, and deposition and trial testimony. John's consulting engagements have resolved without proceeding to deposition or trial testimony — a reflection of the clarity and thoroughness of his written analysis.
Construction defect · Personal injury · Standard of care · Daubert-qualified · Rule 702
Discuss retention"We need to determine whether this HVAC or plumbing loss was caused by a design defect, installation error, or deferred maintenance."
Technical analysis for carriers and subrogation counsel evaluating HVAC and plumbing losses. Common matters include water damage, freeze-up losses, condensate failures, carbon monoxide exposure, Legionella, hot-water scalding, and equipment failures. Written findings formatted for coverage decisions and subrogation recovery.
Subrogation · Coverage disputes · Cause & origin · Personal injury · Property damage
Discuss retentionJohn Melvin is a licensed Professional Engineer with over thirty years of continuous HVAC and plumbing practice — beginning immediately upon receiving his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Montana State University.
He is the founder of Axiom Engineering Group, PLLC, a multi-state SMEP firm, and previously founded JM Engineering, PLLC (2002–2022). He has served as Engineer of Record on healthcare, K–12, higher education, museum, civic, hospitality, and high-end residential projects across the Mountain West — with aggregate reported construction values exceeding $300 million.
His forensic engineering work draws directly on hands-on construction administration experience: weekly site visits, submittal review, RFI response, and commissioning — not just design-table analysis. Opinions on standard of care, design deficiency, code compliance, and causation are grounded in active design practice and the realities of how buildings actually get built.
John's consulting engagements have resolved without proceeding to deposition or trial testimony — a reflection of the clarity and thoroughness of his written analysis.
NCEES Council Record on file — additional jurisdictions available via comity upon formal retention.
Available for retention by plaintiff counsel, defense counsel, and insurance carriers. All engagements are independent — compensation is never contingent on outcome or opinions rendered.
Review of construction drawings, specifications, submittals, RFI logs, O&M manuals, and maintenance records to establish what was designed, what was approved, and what was installed. Provides the evidentiary foundation for expert opinions.
Physical inspection of installed HVAC and plumbing systems — equipment, piping, ductwork, controls — to evaluate workmanship, code compliance, and conformance with construction documents. Root cause analysis of failures and defects.
Detailed written opinions on causation, code compliance, standard of care, and system performance. Structured to meet Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert reliability standards, and formatted for disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and comparable state rules.
Expert deposition testimony on HVAC and plumbing engineering standards, design deficiencies, installation defects, and system failures. Available across all licensed jurisdictions.
Court appearance and expert testimony explaining complex mechanical engineering issues in plain language for judge and jury. Thirty years of practice means opinions grounded in real field experience — not just textbook analysis.
Review of opposing expert reports and written rebuttal opinions identifying technical errors, unsupported conclusions, and deviations from accepted engineering standards and applicable codes.
Technical guidance for litigation attorneys and insurance carriers on HVAC and plumbing engineering issues that arise in construction defect, personal injury, and coverage matters.
Carbon monoxide exposure cases involving HVAC systems require a mechanical engineer who can trace the source — flue gas spillage, backdrafting, improper venting — and establish whether the condition resulted from design error, installation defect, or deferred maintenance.
Read moreManufacturer's installation and application instructions are not suggestions. When an HVAC system fails and those instructions weren't followed — wrong clearances, incorrect refrigerant charge, improper venting, unapproved controls — a mechanical engineer can establish exactly where the deviation occurred and whether it caused the loss.
Read moreNot every HVAC or plumbing loss is what it appears to be. Before closing a claim or pursuing subrogation, carriers should understand whether the loss stems from a covered cause — design error, installation defect, or maintenance failure — and what evidence a mechanical engineer needs to make that determination.
Read moreNot every PE has forensic experience. Here are the questions that separate a strong HVAC expert from a credentialed witness who will fall apart under cross-examination.
Read moreMoisture damage in buildings is frequently blamed on the envelope — but HVAC systems are a common culprit. Condensate failures, duct leakage, and improper ventilation all cause water damage that looks like a roofing problem.
Read moreGround-source heat pump systems fail for two very different reasons — and the liability sits in different places. Here's how a forensic engineer separates an undersized bore field from a poorly installed loop.
Read moreThe standard of care is what a reasonably competent mechanical engineer would do under similar circumstances — not a guarantee, not perfection. Engineers who use words like "guarantee," "all," or "required" in proposals and contracts inadvertently elevate their legal exposure far beyond what the standard of care requires. Here's what that means in litigation.
Read moreRetained on matters involving commercial, institutional, and high-end residential buildings across the Mountain West and beyond.
Evaluation of HVAC and plumbing design against the applicable standard of care, code requirements, and industry standards including ASHRAE 90.1, 62.1, IMC, and IPC.
Inspection and analysis of installed systems for improper installation, code violations, substandard workmanship, or deviation from approved drawings and specifications.
Root-cause analysis of HVAC and plumbing failures — including insufficient heating or cooling, hot-water scalding injuries, carbon monoxide exposure, Legionella and indoor air quality, mold growth from condensation or duct leakage, and premature equipment failure.
Investigation of moisture-related damage attributable to HVAC deficiencies — improper ventilation, condensate management failures, duct leakage, or humidification errors.
Technical analysis for insurance carriers and subrogation counsel evaluating whether HVAC or plumbing losses stem from design error, installation defect, deferred maintenance, or ordinary wear. Common matters include water damage, freeze-up losses, equipment failures, and personal injury claims.
Forensic engineering analysis for personal injury matters involving HVAC and plumbing systems — including hot-water scalding, carbon monoxide poisoning from improperly vented combustion appliances, Legionnaires' disease from cooling towers or domestic water systems, and slip/fall injuries related to mechanical equipment.
Analysis of whether mechanical systems perform in accordance with energy code, modeled projections, or contract requirements — including LEED certification disputes.
Thirty years of design, construction administration, and forensic work across the project types where HVAC and plumbing disputes most commonly arise.
Hospitals, clinics, surgical suites, clean rooms, pharmacy compounding spaces, and outpatient facilities. HVAC expertise covers pressure relationships, infection control ventilation, redundancy, and code compliance under FGI Guidelines and ASHRAE 170.
Public schools, university classrooms, research laboratories, and student health facilities. Particular depth in ventilation per ASHRAE 62.1, energy compliance under IECC, and the operational realities of district-managed buildings.
Museums, libraries, courthouses, and public buildings — including projects with sensitive collections, historic structures, and humidity-controlled exhibit spaces.
Hotels, lodges, resort clubhouses, commercial kitchens, golf and ski clubhouses. HVAC and plumbing in hospitality involves heavy public-area loads, kitchen exhaust, guest comfort, and 24/7 operation.
High-end private residences, ranch compounds, and remote estate properties. Systems include geothermal heat pumps, hydronic radiant heat, snowmelt, humidification, and multi-building campus distribution.
Apartment buildings, condominiums, townhomes, and mixed-use residential. Multi-family disputes commonly involve unit-to-unit comfort complaints, ventilation balance, domestic hot water sizing, and noise transmission from mechanical systems — all areas of direct design experience.
Renovation of historic structures and conversion of existing buildings to new occupancies. These projects raise distinct mechanical issues — concealed conditions, code-triggered upgrades, integration with existing systems, and historic preservation constraints.
Active PE licensure in nine jurisdictions, with concentration in the Mountain West luxury and resort markets. Available for matters in additional states via NCEES comity upon retention.
Missoula · Big Sky · Whitefish · Helena · Bozeman · Hamilton
Home jurisdiction. Active practice across western Montana with extensive healthcare, education, museum, and high-end residential project history. Headquartered in Missoula.
Jackson Hole · Teton County · Statewide
Active practice in Jackson Hole luxury residential and resort markets, including multi-building estate compounds and ranch projects. Available statewide.
Park City · Salt Lake City · St. George · Wasatch & Summit Counties
Active practice across the Wasatch Front and Park City. AEG offices in Salt Lake City and St. George provide direct local presence for site work and inspections.
Aspen · Pitkin County · Summit County · Front Range
Active practice in Aspen and Colorado resort markets, with experience in luxury residential and boutique hospitality projects.
Southern California · Bay Area · Statewide
AEG office in San Diego supports California work directly. Project history includes higher-education and luxury residential matters.
Statewide
Active PE licensure. Available for matters across Idaho, including resort and luxury residential markets in Teton Valley and Sun Valley.
Statewide
Active PE licensure. Available for matters across Nevada including Las Vegas, Reno, and Lake Tahoe markets.
Manhattan · Westchester County · Statewide
Active PE licensure. Luxury residential project history in Manhattan and Westchester County.
Statewide
Active PE licensure. Project history includes large remote-site estate work with geothermal systems.
Other jurisdictions: John maintains an NCEES Council Record enabling comity licensure in additional states upon formal retention. If your matter is in a state not listed above, contact directly to discuss.
Winning a settlement or verdict establishes liability. It doesn't fix the building. Once litigation concludes, the real engineering work begins.
A court finding of defective design or installation doesn't automatically result in a properly functioning HVAC system. The building owner still has a building with the same problems — now with money to fix it and a legal record establishing who is responsible.
The forensic findings from litigation become the engineering brief for remediation. What was wrong, specifically, and what does a proper system look like?
Before any system is redesigned or replaced, a thorough retro-commissioning evaluation establishes exactly what the installed systems are actually doing — and what they are failing to do. This prevents the mistake of replacing equipment that isn't the root problem.
Retro-commissioning measures actual system performance against design intent, identifies control failures, calibration errors, balancing deficiencies, and equipment sizing problems.
Once retro-commissioning identifies the root cause, the path forward is clear: repair what can be repaired, replace what must be replaced, and redesign what was never right in the first place. The goal is a building that finally works as the owner was promised.
Proper remediation requires a licensed mechanical engineer — not just a mechanical contractor following the original flawed drawings.
John's full-service SMEP engineering firm. Once litigation concludes, AEG provides retro-commissioning, system evaluation, and redesign services to make the building work properly — for building owners, attorneys managing remediation, and contractors executing the fix.
Also available before litigation begins: if you are an architect or design team with concerns about a mechanical design and want an independent review to reduce legal risk, that work is handled through AEG — not JM Engineering.
Peer review · Pre-litigation design review · Retro-commissioning · System redesign · New construction M&P engineering
Initial consultations are confidential. If you're not sure whether your matter is a fit, reach out anyway — a short conversation will tell us both what we need to know.
A signed engagement letter and retainer are required before any work begins. Compensation is never contingent on outcome or opinions rendered.
Hourly rates are available upon inquiry. All engagements begin with a brief consultation to assess scope and fit.
Additional jurisdictions: John holds an NCEES Council Record enabling PE licensure in additional states via comity upon formal retention.
Reach out directly or use the scheduling link below to request a consultation.
Request a Consultation →Scheduling link is for qualified matters. Use the chat widget or email first if you're unsure whether your situation is a fit.